Aryo emphasized that they believed the approaching discussion would be among the eagerly awaited responses for the general public, and individuals would certainly be seeing very closely. He ensured that both Ganjar and Mahfud would speak openly throughout the debate, promising that there would be shocks shared by both prospects.
Anies explained that the payment of civil slaves (ASN) to traffic congestion in Jakarta is only between 4% to 7%, highlighting the need to address the traffic issue with electric public transport and by developing more parks in Jakarta.
Andi Widjayanto, the spokesperson for Ganjar-Mahfud, suggested that the Litbang Kompas study did not negative aspect their candidate set. Rather, he pointed out that Ganjar-Mahfud strengthened the vision and goal of “Indonesia Unggul” (Excellent Indonesia) that Jokowi had advertised.
Anies acknowledged Gibran’s candidacy however increased issues concerning the broader situation faced by numerous youngsters today. He pointed out that regardless of their concerns for the nation and marginalized neighborhoods, countless young individuals are being silenced.
According to Anies, the first 2 facets were currently dealing with issues, leading to a reduction in autonomous worths.
Gibran came with Prabowo to the argument, and they departed from Prabowo’s residence in Jakarta. Upon leaving his home, Prabowo took a moment to enable one of his supporters, who determined himself as being from Banyumas, to take a picture with him. Gibran Rakabuming Raka signed up with Prabowo in a white Alphard automobile as they headed to the debate venue.
To conclude, Anies Baswedan firmly opposes the advancement of IKN in East Kalimantan, highlighting that Jakarta’s core concerns ought to take precedence and that public discussion is important in decision-making processes.
Anies suggested three thorough options to resolve disputes in Papua, including dealing with human legal rights violations, stopping future disputes by making sure fairness in work, and involving in participatory discussions.
Governmental prospect second, Prabowo Subianto, responded to the views expressed by governmental candidate top, Anies Baswedan, pertaining to the state of freedom in Indonesia. Prabowo mentioned that Anies was overemphasizing the concerns with Indonesian democracy and shared a tale concerning Anies’ election as Governor of DKI Jakarta, during which Prabowo was in the opposition.
” Mr. Anies is rather exaggerating the concerns with democracy. You were elected as the Governor of DKI Jakarta while dealing with the judgment government, and I sustained you,” said Prabowo during the initial presidential debate held at the KPU on Tuesday (12/12/2023).
Prabowo stressed that Anies might not have become the Guv of DKI Jakarta if freedom did not operate effectively. He asserted that if Head of state Jokowi were a totalitarian, Anies would not have been able to hold that setting.
Anies had actually previously shared his concern that the individuals no much longer relied on the ongoing autonomous process. He detailed three necessary elements of democracy: freedom of speech, a free resistance that can criticize the government and balance it, and a clear and reasonable electoral procedure. According to Anies, the very first two aspects were presently facing problems, causing a decline in autonomous worths.
The exchange highlighted the candidates’ differing perspectives on the state of democracy in Indonesia, with Prabowo responding to Anies’ critique by highlighting the functioning of freedom throughout Anies’ political election as Governor of Jakarta.
[Video clip: VIDEO CLIP: Pre-Debate Celebration for Prabowo-Gibran Discussion, The Ambience at the Jakarta South Location Prior To the Occasion] (https://www.vidio.com/watch/7779619-jelang-nobar-debat-prabowo-gibran-begini-suasana-lokasi-acara-di-jakarta-selatan).
Gibran went along with Prabowo to the discussion, and they departed from Prabowo’s house in Jakarta. Gibran Rakabuming Raka joined Prabowo in a white Alphard cars and truck as they headed to the debate place.
The discussion’s technical style was clarified by the Chairman of the General Election Compensation of the Republic of Indonesia (KPU RI), Hasyim Asy’ari. He guaranteed that the first governmental argument of the 2024 election would certainly not follow the traditional “cerdas cermat” (test) layout. Rather, there would be much more communications in between the candidates, with an overall of 150 mins divided right into 6 segments. Each segment would certainly feature three concerns, and the candidates would react to them mutually. The first prospect to address a concern might then react to the various other 2 candidates’ comments, giving a wrapping up declaration at the end of the segment. This style was designed to urge more dynamic communications during the debate.
In summary, during the debate, Anies Baswedan (Highly recommended Webpage) supported for better youth engagement and highlighted the need for legal reforms to shield the legal rights and voices of youths that appreciate the country and marginalized neighborhoods. He stressed that silencing the youth’s concerns and flexing the policies to favor those in power should not be endured.