1″ Yes, I joined the dispute preparation as part of Team 0It occurred yesterday, for two hours. We conducted simulations and informed Mr. Prabowo,” claimed Ridwan Kamil at the Presidential Palace Complex in Jakarta on Tuesday, December 12023.
Selain itu, Ganjar Pranowo juga menyoroti ketidaksetaraan dalam akses internet dan fasilitas pendidikan antara wilayah tersebut dengan Pulau Jawa. Ia menekankan pentingnya memberikan akses internet gratis kepada para siswa agar mereka memiliki kesempatan yang sama dengan siswa di Pulau Jawa.
Ganjar Pranowo juga berbicara tentang pasangannya, Mahfud Md, yang mendengarkan aspirasi dari wilayah barat Indonesia. Mereka berdua berjanji untuk memberikan insentif bagi para master agama di Aceh dengan tujuan untuk mengajarkan budi pekerti yang rukun.
Anies acknowledged Gibran’s candidacy however raised worries regarding the broader scenario encountered by numerous young individuals today. He pointed out that in spite of their worries for the nation and marginalized neighborhoods, numerous young people are being silenced.
Governmental candidate number 1, Anies Baswedan, resolved the concern of youth representation during the governmental argument on Tuesday, December 12, 2023. He highlighted the situation of one millennial that became a vice-presidential prospect in the 2024 political election, describing Gibran Rakabuming Raka.
During the presidential dispute, vice-presidential candidate number two, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, contacted his supporters to make some noise as his running mate, governmental candidate Prabowo Subianto, reacted to an inquiry postured by governmental candidate number 3, Anies Baswedan.
Presidential prospect leading, Anies Baswedan, emphasizes that the Omnibus Regulation on the National Funding Area (IKN) is an instance of a lawful product that did not go through a complete public discussion process. He made this declaration in feedback to a concern from governmental prospect number 3, Ganjar Pranowo; Www.Liputan6.Com,, during the Presidential Discussion at the General Political Election Commission (KPU) office in Jakarta on Tuesday evening (12/12/2023).
During the presidential debate, Ganjar asked Anies about his position on federal government policies, including the IKN, as an opposition number, and whether he would certainly reject the extension of the IKN.
Anies Baswedan responded, “This is one example of a legal product that did not undergo a total public discussion procedure prior to ending up being law.”
He even more explained that the IKN did not undertake a thorough conversation procedure that permitted public participation. Anies emphasized that Indonesia is a guideline of regulation country, not a power-based one. Therefore, any kind of plan provided should be based on guidelines, not just the exercise of power.
” In this argument, Ganjar asked Anies regarding his placement as an opposition figure relating to federal government policies, including the IKN, and whether he would reject the extension of the IKN.”
Anies stressed that Indonesia is a country governed by the policy of law, where policies need to be based upon regulations and not arbitrary power. He discussed that the IKN is an instance of a lawful product that lacked a full public discussion procedure, which he believes is vital in a democratic society.
” In a democracy, there must be openness, public participation, and comprehensive conversations prior to a law is enacted. The IKN did not go via such a procedure.”
Anies additionally explained that there are immediate requirements for the individuals that should take precedence over the construction of the IKN. He examined the concerns when important demands for individuals, like fertilizer, are not sufficiently attended to while sources are assigned to developing a governmental palace.
” In his response, Anies raised problems concerning the IKN and its absence of public discussion, emphasizing the significance of openness and public involvement in the democratic procedure.”
He highlighted the demand for plans to prioritize the wellness of individuals and questioned the allocation of resources for tasks like the IKN when fundamental requirements are unmet.
” Anies’s declarations in the argument dropped light on the difficulties of policy-making and the importance of public participation in democratic decision-making.”
He stressed the concepts of a regulation of legislation nation and the requirement for detailed discussions to guarantee that policies offer the interests of the people.
” Generally, Anies’s action shows his dedication to autonomous worths and his concerns regarding plan processes in Indonesia.”
He thinks that greater transparency and public participation are necessary for the improvement of the nation.
He additionally clarified that the IKN did not undertake a thorough discussion process that allowed public involvement. Anies emphasized that Indonesia is a policy of regulation country, not a power-based one. Any type of plan released must be based on policies, not simply the exercise of power.
